Lin, X.-J., Lin, I. M. & Fan, S.-Y. Methodological issues in measuring health-related quality of life. Tzu Chi Med. J. 25, 8–12 (2013).
Google Scholar
Guyatt, G. H. et al. Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clin. Proc. 82, 1229–1239 (2007).
Google Scholar
Virani, S. S. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2021 update. Circulation 143, e254–e743 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carod-Artal, F. J. & Egido, J. A. Quality of life after stroke: The importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 27, 204–214 (2009).
Google Scholar
Nichols-Larsen, D. S., Clark, P. C., Zeringue, A., Greenspan, A. & Blanton, S. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 36, 1480–1484 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bzdok, D. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. Exploration, inference, and prediction in neuroscience and biomedicine. Trends Neurosci. 42, 251–262 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guyon, I. & Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003).
Google Scholar
Heo, J. et al. Machine learning-based model for prediction of outcomes in acute stroke. Stroke 50, 1263–1265 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, W. Y. et al. Predicting post-stroke activities of daily living through a machine learning-based approach on initiating rehabilitation. Int. J. Med. Inform. 111, 159–164 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sale, P. et al. Predicting motor and cognitive improvement through machine learning algorithm in human subject that underwent a rehabilitation treatment in the early stage of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 27, 2962–2972 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. L. et al. Automatic machine-learning-based outcome prediction in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Front. Neurol. 10, 910 (2019).
Google Scholar
Thakkar, H. K., Liao, W. W., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W. & Lee, T. H. Predicting clinically significant motor function improvement after contemporary task-oriented interventions using machine learning approaches. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 17, 131 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tokmakçı, M., Ünalan, D., Soyuer, F. & Öztürk, A. The reevaluate statistical results of quality of life in patients with cerebrovascular disease using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 958–963 (2008).
Google Scholar
Morris, J. H., van Wijck, F., Joice, S. & Donaghy, M. Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: The role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disabil. Rehabil. 35, 291–299 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. & Lapalme, G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf Process Manag. 45, 427–437 (2009).
Google Scholar
Turner, D. L., Ramos-Murguialday, A., Birbaumer, N., Hoffmann, U. & Luft, A. Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: A perspective for future use in clinical populations. Front. Neurol. 4, 184 (2013).
Google Scholar
Deconinck, F. J. et al. Reflections on mirror therapy: A systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 349–361 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schlaug, G., Renga, V. & Nair, D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch. Neurol. 65, 1571–1576 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kutner, N. G., Zhang, R., Butler, A. J., Wolf, S. L. & Alberts, J. L. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 90, 493–504 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mehrholz, J. Is electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training effective for improving arm function in people who have had a stroke?: A cochrane review summary with commentary. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 98, 339–340 (2019).
Google Scholar
Thieme, H. et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7, Cd008449 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bornheim, S. et al. Evaluating the effects of tDCS in stroke patients using functional outcomes: A systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil. 44, 13–23 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kang, N., Summers, J. J. & Cauraugh, J. H. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87, 345 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liao, W. W. et al. Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 17, 101 (2020).
Google Scholar
An, T. G., Kim, S. H. & Kim, K. U. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients on depression and quality of life. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 29, 505–507 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wu, C. Y., Huang, P. C., Chen, Y. T., Lin, K. C. & Yang, H. W. Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 1023–1030 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hsieh, Y. W. et al. Effects of home-based versus clinic-based rehabilitation combining mirror therapy and task-specific training for patients with stroke: A randomized crossover trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 99, 2399–2407 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hsieh, Y. W. et al. Comparison of proximal versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation on motor performance after stroke: A cluster controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 8, 2091 (2018).
Google Scholar
Woodbury, M. L., Velozo, C. A., Richards, L. G. & Duncan, P. W. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 1527–1533 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gregson, J. M. et al. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 1013–1016 (1999).
Google Scholar
Rossi, S. et al. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert guidelines. Clin. Neurophysiol. 132, 269–306 (2021).
Google Scholar
Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Min Lai, S. & Perera, S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 950–963 (2003).
Google Scholar
Carod-Artal, F. J., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S. & Moreira, C. M. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Stroke 39, 2477–2484 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lin, K. C. et al. Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale. Qual. Life Res. 19, 435–443 (2010).
Google Scholar
Richardson, M., Campbell, N., Allen, L., Meyer, M. & Teasell, R. The stroke impact scale: Performance as a quality of life measure in a community-based stroke rehabilitation setting. Disabil. Rehabil. 38, 1425–1430 (2016).
Google Scholar
Duncan, P. W. et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30, 2131–2140 (1999).
Google Scholar
Lang, C. E., Edwards, D. F., Birkenmeier, R. L. & Dromerick, A. W. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89, 1693–1700 (2008).
Google Scholar
van der Lee, J. H. et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30, 2369–2375 (1999).
Google Scholar
Hägg, O., Fritzell, P. & Nordwall, A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur. Spine J. 12, 12–20 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wu, C. Y., Chuang, L. L., Lin, K. C., Lee, S. D. & Hong, W. H. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92, 1281–1287 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lemmens, R. J., Timmermans, A. A., Janssen-Potten, Y. J., Smeets, R. J. & Seelen, H. A. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: A systematic review. BMC Neurol. 12, 21 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. M. et al. Potential predictors for health-related quality of life in stroke patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 13, 118 (2015).
Google Scholar
Coupar, F., Pollock, A., Rowe, P., Weir, C. & Langhorne, P. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rehabil. 26, 291–313 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chiti, G. & Pantoni, L. Use of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with stroke. Stroke 45, 3135–3140 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S. & Steglind, S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 7, 13–31 (1975).
Google Scholar
Wolf, S. L. et al. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32, 1635–1639 (2001).
Google Scholar
Gregson, J. M. et al. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing 29, 223–228 (2000).
Google Scholar
van der Lee, J. H., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., de Vet, H. C. & Bouter, L. M. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 35, 1410–1414 (2004).
Google Scholar
Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hébert, R., Dutil, É. & Mercier, L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 751–755 (1994).
Google Scholar
Wu, C. Y., Chuang, I. C., Ma, H. I., Lin, K. C. & Chen, C. L. Validity and responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment for outcome evaluation in stroke rehabilitation. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 70, 1–8 (2016).
Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V. & Hamilton, B. B. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 127–132 (1994).
Google Scholar
Sarker, S. J., Rudd, A. G., Douiri, A. & Wolfe, C. D. Comparison of 2 extended activities of daily living scales with the Barthel Index and predictors of their outcomes: Cohort study within the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). Stroke 43, 1362–1369 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tin, K. H. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 832–844 (1998).
Google Scholar
Cover, T. & Hart, P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13, 21–27 (1967).
Google Scholar
Zhu, M., Chen, W., Hirdes, J. P. & Stolee, P. The K-nearest neighbor algorithm predicted rehabilitation potential better than current clinical assessment protocol. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 60, 1015–1021 (2007).
Google Scholar
Manning, T., Sleator, R. D. & Walsh, P. Biologically inspired intelligent decision making. Bioengineered 5, 80–95 (2014).
Google Scholar
Abedi, V. et al. Novel screening tool for stroke using artificial neural network. Stroke 48, 1678–1681 (2017).
Google Scholar
Smola, A. J. & Schölkopf, B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 14, 199–222 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. K., Choo, Y. J. & Chang, M. C. Prediction of motor function in stroke patients using machine learning algorithm: Development of practical models. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 30, 105856 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiawei, H. M. K. & Jian, P. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques 2nd edn. (Morgan Kaufmann, 2006).
Google Scholar
Shouman, M., Turner, T. & Stocker, R. Using decision tree for diagnosing heart disease patients. In Proceedings of the Ninth Australasian Data Mining Conference, vol. 121, 23–30 (Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2011).
Kent, J. T. Information gain and a general measure of correlation. Biometrika 70, 163–173 (1983).
Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. A systematic review of machine learning models for predicting outcomes of stroke with structured data. PLoS ONE 15, e0234722 (2020).
Google Scholar
Luo, W. et al. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: A multidisciplinary view. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e323 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. D., Perez, A. & Lozano, J. A. Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 569–575 (2010).
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Google Scholar
Hall, M. et al. The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10–18 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pandey, A. K., Rajpoot, D. S. & Rajpoot, D. S. A comparative study of classification techniques by utilizing WEKA. In 2016 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC) (2016).
Frank, E., Hall, M., Trigg, L., Holmes, G. & Witten, I. H. Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 20, 2479–2481 (2004).
Google Scholar
Sim, J. A. et al. The major effects of health-related quality of life on 5-year survival prediction among lung cancer survivors: Applications of machine learning. Sci. Rep. 10, 10693 (2020).
Google Scholar
Scrutinio, D. et al. Machine learning to predict mortality after rehabilitation among patients with severe stroke. Sci. Rep. 10, 20127 (2020).
Google Scholar
Apao, N. J., Feliscuzo, L. S., Romana, C. L. S. & Tagaro, J. Multiclass classification using random forest algorithm to prognosticate the level of activity of patients with stroke. IJSTR 9, 1233–1240 (2020).
Badriyah, T., Sakinah, N., Syarif, I. & Syarif, D. R. Machine learning algorithm for stroke disease classification. In 2020 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (2020).
White, J. et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A cohort study. Fam. Pract. 33, 382–387 (2016).
Google Scholar
Katona, M., Schmidt, R., Schupp, W. & Graessel, E. Predictors of health-related quality of life in stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: A prospective study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 13, 58 (2015).
Google Scholar
Huang, P. C. et al. Predictors of motor, daily function, and quality-of-life improvements after upper-extremity robot-assisted rehabilitation in stroke. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 68, 325–333 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nijenhuis, S. M. et al. Strong relations of elbow excursion and grip strength with post-stroke arm function and activities: Should we aim for this in technology-supported training?. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 5, 2055668318779301 (2018).
Google Scholar
Clarke, P. & Black, S. E. Quality of life following stroke: Negotiating disability, identity, and resources. J. Appl. Gerontol. 24, 319–336 (2005).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, S. G. et al. Stroke-specific quality of life one-year post-stroke in two Scandinavian country-regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services: A prospective study. Disabil. Rehabil. 43, 3810–3820 (2021).
Google Scholar
Doyle, S., Bennett, S., Fasoli, S. E. & McKenna, K. T. Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD006331 (2010).
Wu, C. W., Seo, H. J. & Cohen, L. G. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, 351–357 (2006).
Google Scholar
Turville, M., Carey, L. M., Matyas, T. A. & Blennerhassett, J. Change in functional arm use is associated with somatosensory skills after sensory retraining poststroke. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 71, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Meyer, S., Karttunen, A. H., Thijs, V., Feys, H. & Verheyden, G. How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys. Ther. 94, 1220–1231 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rokach, L. Ensemble methods for classifiers. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (eds Maimon, O. & Rokach, L.) 957–980 (Springer, 2005).
Google Scholar
Hung, C. Y., Chen, W. C., Lai, P. T., Lin, C. H. & Lee, C. C. Comparing deep neural network and other machine learning algorithms for stroke prediction in a large-scale population-based electronic medical claims database. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2017, 3110–3113 (2017).